FEP-9967: Update proposal (#479)

- Removed incorrect statement about identification via inReplyTo.
- Removed mention of multi-object Create activity.
- Added mention of Respond activity.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/479
Co-authored-by: silverpill <silverpill@firemail.cc>
Co-committed-by: silverpill <silverpill@firemail.cc>

fep/9967/fep-9967.jsonld

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "@context": {
+    "Respond": "https://w3id.org/fep/9967/Respond"
+  }
+}

fep/9967/fep-9967.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 slug: "9967"
 authors: silverpill <@silverpill@mitra.social>
 status: DRAFT
-discussionsTo: https://codeberg.org/silverpill/feps/issues
+discussionsTo: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-9967-polls/4885
 dateReceived: 2025-01-23
 trackingIssue: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/issues/478
 ---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The object MUST NOT have a `content` property.
 
 This object is wrapped in a `Create` activity and sent to the author of the poll. If the poll is anonymous, this activity MUST NOT be delivered to anyone else.
 
-When a poll allows multiple choices, each vote MUST be sent as a separate activity. However, consumers SHOULD also be able to parse `Create` activity where `object` is an array of votes.
+When a poll allows multiple choices, each vote MUST be sent as a separate activity.
 
 Example of a vote:
 
@@ -106,7 +106,10 @@ Example of a vote:
 }
 ```
 
-A vote can be identified by checking whether the object specified by `inReplyTo` property is a `Question`. It can also be identified as a `Note` with `name` and without `content`, but this method is less reliable.
+The structure of a vote is very similar to a direct reply. It can be identified as a `Note` with `name` and `inReplyTo` properties, but without a `content` property.
+
+>[!NOTE]
+>The method of identifying votes described here is not reliable. An alternative representation is being discussed (the `Respond` activity).
 
 Upon receving a vote, the author of the poll performs the following checks: